• Welcome to Saif Energy Limited : (051) 5913012

Tag Archives: #OilAndGas

Key Concepts of Petroleum Migration by Zhiyong He, ZetaWare, Inc.

Key Concepts of Petroleum Migration by Zhiyong He, ZetaWare, Inc.

Capillary Seals and Migration

Capillary seals are the primary mechanism controlling the movement of hydrocarbons within a sedimentary basin. These seals form barriers within the porous rock layers, preventing the vertical migration of oil and gas. Instead of moving upward toward the surface, hydrocarbons are often forced to migrate laterally along the stratigraphic layers of the basin.

Capillary seals arise due to differences in the rock properties, particularly pore throat sizes. Rocks with smaller pores (like mudstones or shales) generate higher capillary pressures that trap hydrocarbons beneath them. Vertical migration can only occur if the pressure from the buoyancy of oil and gas is strong enough to overcome this capillary force. As a result, lateral migration becomes the more common pathway for hydrocarbons, with the accumulation of oil and gas occurring in traps when they encounter geological structures like folds, faults, and salt domes.

Migration Rate

Hydrocarbon migration is a slow and gradual process, often taking years or even decades for hydrocarbons to move across pore spaces in a reservoir rock. The migration rate is influenced by a combination of capillary pressure, buoyancy, and the properties of the fluids involved, such as the mixture of oil and gas.

Capillary pressure refers to the resistance that hydrocarbons face when moving through small pore spaces in the rock. This resistance increases with smaller pore sizes, requiring higher buoyancy forces to drive the fluids. The rate of migration is also determined by the generation rate of hydrocarbons from the source rock. If the production of oil and gas is slow, migration will occur at a similarly slow pace, with hydrocarbons moving as they are generated.

Long-Distance Migration

In some basins, hydrocarbons can migrate over long distances, often traveling hundreds of kilometers before accumulating in traps. This long-distance migration is typical in low-relief basins, such as forland or continental basins, where geological structures do not impede lateral movement.

The ability of hydrocarbons to migrate over such distances is largely driven by the volume of hydrocarbons generated by the source rock. Rich source rocks that produce significant quantities of oil and gas push these fluids across the basin, allowing them to travel far before encountering a trap. The absence of substantial structural barriers also facilitates extended lateral migration, with hydrocarbons only accumulating when they encounter faults, pinch-outs, or other obstacles.

Capillary Pressure and Traps

Vertical vs. Lateral Migration

Vertical migration is typically more difficult due to the strong capillary pressures associated with impermeable or low-permeability rock layers. These barriers prevent hydrocarbons from moving upward unless the buoyancy forces can overcome the capillary resistance, which often requires a significant column of oil or gas. As a result, vertical migration is less common, and hydrocarbons are more likely to migrate laterally.

Lateral migration is easier because it encounters fewer barriers. Within a stratigraphic layer, such as a sandstone or carbonate, capillary pressures are often lower, making it easier for hydrocarbons to move sideways. This lateral migration continues until hydrocarbons encounter a trap that forces them to accumulate, such as a fault, a pinch-out, or a structural dome.

Capillary pressure and rock types: Different rock types exhibit varying levels of capillary pressure due to differences in pore throat sizes:

Shales or mudstones have small pore throats, creating high capillary pressures and acting as effective seals.

Sands or carbonates typically have larger pore throats, making them more permeable and allowing easier fluid movement.

This variation in capillary pressure influences the arrangement of oil and gas. Gas, being more buoyant, is often found above oil, but capillary pressure differences in the rock can cause hydrocarbons to accumulate in different ways, either vertically or laterally.

Capillary Pressure’s Role in Trap Formation

Capillary pressure is crucial in forming traps where hydrocarbons accumulate. When oil and gas migrate, they accumulate in areas where there is a significant difference in capillary pressure between rock layers. If the capillary pressure in a seal is high, hydrocarbons accumulate below it until the buoyancy pressure exceeds the capillary resistance, leading to the formation of reservoirs.

Traps such as faults, folds, and salt domes are critical for halting lateral migration and forcing hydrocarbons to accumulate. High-capacity traps with strong seals can hold large volumes of hydrocarbons, while weaker traps may only retain smaller quantities. This explains why some fields are larger and more productive than others.

What is happening in the area you’re working, please share your views!!!

Reference

Concepts and explanations regarding capillary seals, migration rates, and long-distance migration have been drawn from the presentation by Dr. Zong on “Capillary Seals and Petroleum Migration”.

Diagrams are also taken from this AAPG paper, “Migration and Charge Risk for Stratigraphic Traps “

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin Opportuintites

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities and Challenges

Exploring The Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities And Challenges

The Offshore Indus Pak G2-1, the deepest well drilled in the Offshore Indus in terms of water depth, offers interesting insights into the region’s hydrocarbon potential. Despite its depth, the 1D burial history graph (Figure 1) indicates that the well did not achieve the required burial to crack any hydrocarbons. This well, drilled near the Saurashtra Volcanic Arch, encountered a reef, yet remained dry, and the play couldn’t be established.

Reservoir Insights:

Drilling data reveals two sets of proven reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin

  • Widely Distributed Miocene Channel Sandstones
  • Locally Distributed Paleocene–Eocene Reef Limestone

Analogies with the adjacent Kutch Basin and the onshore Indus Basin suggest the possible existence of Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin.

Challenges and Historical Context:

The well stopped in the reef limestone after drilling over 200 meters, and unfortunately, it was dry. It was believed that the adjoining synclines would have generated hydrocarbons that would have migrated to the highs (the reefs) but the concept failed. Since the well was stopped early in the reef, remodeling of data in the context of basin is quite difficult. Had the well penetrated the basement, it would have been quite interesting. It was also believed that the reef would be riding all over the basement rocks.  The only proven reservoir is Middle Miocene deltaics that have produced gas in Pak Can-01, but the gas column was too small to justify infrastructure development.

It seems that volcanic activity plays a significant role in the evolution of the offshore part of the Indus Basin and its implications have far-reaching consequences on the hydrocarbon potential.

There have been two major volcanic events in the sea area of Pakistan:

Basalt Eruption of Somnath Ridge (~70 Ma)

Basalt Eruption of Deccan-Reunion (Reunion Mantle Plume, ~65 Ma)

According to Calvès et al. (2010), the basalt eruption of Somnath Ridge contributed to the formation of the volcanic basement in the southeastern Offshore Indus Basin, particularly around Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High. This area covers approximately 45,000 km².

Geological Insights:

Seismic data interpretation indicates (Figure 2) (that in the southeastern part of the basin adjacent to Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High, Deccan basalts are distributed in the marine-facies strata of the Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene in a laminated form (Khurram et al., 2019). The northwestern part, far from the Reunion mantle plume, has minimal basalt impact but is close to the strike-slip fault zone of Murray Ridge, making it a potential focus for future oil and gas exploration.

Geothermal Gradients:

Somnath Ridge: Low geothermal gradient of 33℃/km.

Sedimentary Center: High geothermal gradient of 37℃/km – 55℃/km, aiding source rock maturity (Calvès et al., 2010).

The northwestern part, with its developed faults near Murray Ridge, presents an interesting area for future exploration. There are chances that the established Cretaceous plays would be found there (Figure-02).

In most of the wells drilled, the source rocks are in oil window but Pak Can-01 produced gas suggesting that the gas would have been migrated from the deeper part of the basin. Modeling suggests that the Paleocene source rocks (effective in the adjoining onshore) may have become post mature at the end of Oligocene suggesting a charge to the Miocene and younger reservoirs by shallower source rocks.

🔗 Follow us for more insights into the evolving energy landscape and exploration opportunities in the Offshore Indus Basin!

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin

Figure 2 . After Shahzad et. al.

References:

Calves G, Schwab AM, Huuse M, Peter DC, Asif I.  2010.  Thermal regime of the northwest Indian rifted margin Comparison with Predictions. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1133–1147.  doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.02.010.

Chatterjee S, Goswami A, Scotese. 2013. The longest voyage: Tectonic, magmatic, and paleoclimatic evolution of the Indian plate during its northward flight from Gondwana to Asia. Gondwana Research, 23, 238–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.07.001.

Jian-ming Gonga, b, c, Jing Liaoa, b, *, Jie Lianga, b, Bao-hua Leia, b, Jian-wen Chena, b, Muhammad Khalid, Syed Waseem Haidere, Ming Meng. Exploration prospects of oil and gas in the Northwestern part of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan

Shahzad K, Betzler C, Ahmed N, Qayyum F, Spezzaferri S, Qadir A. 2018. Growth and demise of a Paleogene isolated carbonate platform of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan: Effects of regional and local controlling factors. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 107, 481–504. doi: 10.1007/s00531-017-1504-7.