• Welcome to Saif Energy Limited : (051) 5913012

Tag Archives: #OilAndGas

How Technology is Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry

How Technology is Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry

The oil and gas industry has long been a cornerstone of the global energy supply, but with growing environmental concerns, increasing costs, and shifting energy demands, innovation is no longer optional—it’s essential. Technology is reshaping how the industry approaches exploration and production, delivering significant improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and environmental sustainability.

Innovations Driving the Industry Forward

Recent technological breakthroughs have redefined oil and gas exploration:

  • 3D & 4D Seismic Imaging: Advanced sound wave imaging provides precise data about subsurface formations, improving drilling accuracy and cutting costs.
  • Unconventional Extraction Techniques: Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing make previously inaccessible reserves viable, significantly boosting production.
  • Automation & Robotics: These technologies enhance safety and efficiency by automating complex processes like offshore drilling.
  • Data Analytics & Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI predicts equipment failures and optimizes operations, enabling smarter decision-making.
  • Blockchain Technology: Secure digital ledgers enhance transparency, reduce fraud, and streamline supply chain operations.
  • Digital Twinning: Virtual models of physical assets allow real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and process optimization.

Challenges to Technology Adoption

Despite the clear benefits, the industry faces hurdles in embracing these innovations:

  • High Implementation Costs: Advanced technologies often require substantial investment.
  • Resistance to Change: Traditional mindsets can slow down adoption.
  • Cybersecurity Risks: Increasing digitization exposes companies to potential cyber threats.
  • Technical Limitations: Some technologies are still evolving and may not yet be fully reliable.

The Future of Innovation in Oil and Gas

The future is promising, with emerging technologies like nanotechnology, augmented reality, and machine learning poised to revolutionize the industry further. By addressing the challenges of adoption, the oil and gas sector can pave the way for a more sustainable, efficient, and profitable future.

Conclusion

The integration of technology into the oil and gas industry is no longer optional; it’s a necessity for survival in a competitive and environmentally-conscious world. Policymakers, investors, and industry leaders must stay informed about technological advancements to drive growth, sustainability, and innovation. By embracing these changes, the industry can continue meeting global energy demands while minimizing its environmental footprint.

Reference

Smith, J., Doe, R., & Johnson, P. (2023). Innovation in Exploration and Production: How Technology Is Changing the Oil and Gas Landscape. Read more
Pakistan On-Shore Bidding Round 2025

Pakistan On-Shore Bidding Round 2025

S. No. Block Name Zone Area (km²) Location (Districts)
1
PARKINI-II BLOCK-A (2564-6)
Zone-I
1,892
Awaran & Kech
2
PARKINI-II BLOCK-B (2564-7)
Zone-I
1,908
Pasni & Awaran
3
RASHMALAN-II (2564-8)
Zone-I
1,196
Pasni & Awaran
4
RASHMALAN-II WEST (2564-9)
Zone-I
1,451.97
Pasni & Awaran
5
PHARPUR-II (3170-13)
Zone-II
1,222.6
D. I. Khan & Tank
6
KHIU-II (3171-4)
Zone-II
2225.15
Bhakkar & Khushab
7
LAYYAH-II (3070-18)
Zone-II
1445.81
Layyah & D. G. Khan
8
ALIPUR-II (2970-10)
Zone-II
2225.15
Muzaffargarh, Multan, Bahawalpur and Rahimyar Khan
9
RACHNA-II (3071-6)
Zone-II
1,189.55
Khanewal, Jhang & Layyah
10
KHANPUR-II (2870-8)
Zone-II
1,189.55
Rahim Yar Khan
11
CHHALGARI (2867-7)
Zone-II
2,485.19
Bolan, Nasirabad & Jhal Magsi
12
DERA MURAD JAMALI (2868-9)
Zone-II
2,282.09
Bolan, Nasirabad, Jaffarabad & Jacobabad
13
KALAT SOUTH (2865-5)
Zone-II
2,488.19
Kalat & Jhal Magsi
14
SOHBAT PUR (2868-8)
Zone-III
2,497.50
Jacobabad, Jaffarabad, Kashmore & Dera Bughti
15
KOT MAGSI (2767-6)
Zone-III
2,213.43
Nasirabad, Jhal Magsi, Jaffarabad, Kambar/ Shahdad Kot & Jacobabad
16
KAMBAR (2767-5)
Zone-III
2,245.86
Kambar/Shahdad Kot & Larkana
17
ZAMZAMA-II SOUTH (2667-16)
Zone-III
473.90
Jamshoro & Dadu
18
SUKHPUR-II (2568-23)
Zone-III
2,488.36
Jamshoro & Nawabshah
19
NAING SHARIF (2667-20)
Zone-III
205.58
Jamshoro & Dadu
20
JHERRUCK (2468-13)
Zone-III
732.73
Thatta & Tando Muhammad Khan
21
ZIARAT NORTH (2966-3)
Zone-I (F)
2,120.5
Ziarat, Loralai, Quetta, Mastung, Sibi, Pishin & Mach
22
KALAT NORTH (2966-4)
Zone-I (F)
2,499.96
Kalat, Mastung & Noshki
23
AHMAD WAL (2965-1)
Zone-I (F)
2,268
Kharan & Noshki
24
PADAG (2864-3)
Zone-I (F)
2,477.39
Chagai & Noshki
25
CHAGAI (2864-4)
Zone-I (F)
2,474.17
Chagai
26
DALBANDIN (2864-5)
Zone-I (F)
2,497.99
Chagai
27
MERUI (2864-6)
Zone-I (F)
2,478.68
Chagai
28
MERUI WEST (2863-1)
Zone-I (F)
2,491.45
Chagai
29
NOKUNDI SOUTH (2763-7)
Zone-I (F)
2,158.75
Chagai, Kharan
30
NOKUNDI (2862-2)
Zone-I (F)
2,452.3
Chagai
31
TOZGI (2861-1)
Zone-I (F)
2,427.58
Chagai

ZONE I

1. PARKINI-II BLOCK-A (2564-6)

The Parkini-II Block-A, covering 1,892 sq. km in Balochistan’s Kech, Awaran, and Gwadar districts, is located in the Makran Basin, with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block falls within Prospectivity Zone I and features favorable petroleum systems with source rocks like the Oligocene Hoshab Formation and Miocene Panjgur and Parkini Formations.

2. PARKINI-II BLOCK-B (2564-7)

Parkini-II Block-B, covering 1,908 sq. km in Balochistan’s Awaran and Gwadar districts, is part of the Makran Basin and lies within Prospectivity Zone I. The block is estimated to hold 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The petroleum system features source rocks from the Oligocene Hoshab Formation, Miocene Panjgur and Parkini Formations, and Pliocene Talar/Hinglaj Formations, while reservoir rocks include Middle to Upper Miocene turbidities.

3. RASMALAN-II (2564-8)

Rasmalan-II Block spans 1,196 sq. km in Balochistan’s Makran Basin, with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block’s geological setting includes potential anticline structures and diapirism, offering significant exploration opportunities. Nearby infrastructure, including gas fields and thermal power stations, adds to its attractiveness.

4. RASMALAN-II West (2564-9)

Rasmalan-II West Block spans 1,451.97 sq. km in Balochistan’s Makran Basin, with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block features thrust-related anticlines and diapirism, making it a strong candidate for hydrocarbon exploration. Located near existing gas fields and thermal power stations, the block benefits from government support for infrastructure development.

ZONE II

5. PAHARPUR-II (3170-13)

The Paharpur-II Block, located in Dera Ismail Khan and Tank districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, covers 1,222.6 sq. km. It is situated within the Sulaiman Foldbelt and has estimated resources of 2,880 million barrels of oil and 69.12 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block features favorable petroleum systems with source rocks like the Sembar Formation and reservoir rocks such as the Pirkoh and Habib Rahi formations.

6. KHIU-II (3171-4)

The Khiu-II Block, located in Khushab and Bakhar districts of Punjab, Pakistan, is part of the Onshore Block Bidding Round 2025. Covering 2225.15 sq. km in the Punjab Platform, the block holds estimated resources of 2,880 million barrels of oil and 69.12 trillion cubic feet of gas. Surrounded by key neighboring blocks, it has been the subject of seismic data collection from major companies.

7. LAYYAH-II (3070-18)

The Layyah-II Block, located in Punjab, Pakistan, spans 1445.81 sq. km and lies in the Central Indus Basin. It falls under Prospectivity Zone II, with significant resources estimated at 2880 million barrels of oil and 69.12 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block has been explored by companies like AMOCO, OGDCL, UNOCAL, and PPL, with extensive 2D data acquired. Geological formations in the area include fault-bounded structures and thick-skinned tectonics, with the Sembar Formation (Cretaceous) as the primary source rock. The trapping mechanism includes pinch-out traps and anticlines.

8. ALIPUR-II (2970-10)

The Khiu-II Block, located in Khushab and Bakhar districts of Punjab, Pakistan, is part of the Onshore Block Bidding Round 2025. Covering 2225.15 sq. km in the Punjab Platform, the block holds estimated resources of 2,880 million barrels of oil and 69.12 trillion cubic feet of gas. Surrounded by key neighboring blocks, it has been the subject of seismic data collection from major companies.

9. RACHNA-II (3071-6)

Rachna-II Block covers 1,189.55 sq. km in Punjab’s Middle Indus Basin, with estimated resources of 200 million barrels of oil and 19.6 trillion cubic feet of gas. It has high exploration potential due to varied structural patterns and excellent reservoir rocks.

10. KHANPUR-II (2870-8)

The Khanpur-II Block, located in the Rahimyar Khan district of Punjab, Pakistan, is part of the Onshore Block Bidding Round 2025. Spanning 2245.41 sq. km in the Punjab Platform, this block is estimated to contain 2,880 million barrels of oil and 69.12 trillion cubic feet of gas. Surrounded by key neighboring blocks, it presents significant hydrocarbon potential, supported by seismic data from past acquisitions.

11. CHHALGARI (2867-7)

Nestled in the heart of Balochistan’s dynamic geological landscape, the Chhalgari Block is a promising frontier for hydrocarbon exploration. Spanning 2,485.19 sq. km across Nasirabad, Bolan, and Jhal Magsi districts, this region boasts significant untapped potential with an estimated 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas.

12. DERA MURAD JAMALI(2868-9)

The Dera Murad Jamali Block, spanning 2,282.09 sq. km in the Lower Indus Basin, is a promising hydrocarbon exploration site under the Kirthar Fold Belt. Rich in Cretaceous Sembar shales (source rock) and with proven reservoirs like Mughalkot, Pab Sandstone, and Sui Main Limestone, the block offers significant oil and gas potential.

13. KALAT SOUTH (2865-5)

The Kalat South Block, located in the heart of Balochistan, Pakistan, is part of the Onshore Block Bidding Round 2024. Covering 2488.19 sq. km, this highly prospective area offers significant hydrocarbon resources, including an estimated 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas.

ZONE III

14. SOHBAT PUR (2868-8)

The Sohbat Pur Block, covering 2,497.50 sq. km in the Central Indus Basin, is a promising area for hydrocarbon exploration. It falls within Prospectivity Zone III and is surrounded by Zorghar, Zin, and Yasin blocks. The block benefits from extensive 2D seismic data collected over multiple years and features both structural and stratigraphic traps. Nearby infrastructure includes gas fields, pipelines, purification plants, and a thermal power plant.

15. KOT MAGSI (2767-6)

The Kot Magsi Block, located in Balochistan, Pakistan, spans 2213.43 sq. km and falls under Prospectivity Zone III. It holds significant hydrocarbon potential, with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas in the Balochistan Basin. The block has been explored by major companies like Amoco, BP, OMV, and others. The area’s geological history shows tectonic influences, with the Kalat Anticlinorium and surrounding structures offering favorable exploration conditions.

16. KAMBAR (2767-5)

The Kambar Block, located in the Sindh province of Pakistan, is part of the Onshore Block Bidding Round 2025. Covering 2245.86 sq. km in the Kirthar Foldbelt, this block holds significant hydrocarbon potential with estimated resources of 4,740 million barrels of oil and 64.75 trillion cubic feet of gas.

17. ZAMZAMA-II SOUTH (2667-16)

The Zamzama-II South block covers 473.90 sq. km in the Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan, and is located in Prospectivity Zone III. The block has substantial hydrocarbon potential, with the Pab Formation as a primary reservoir and the Mughal Kot Shale as the source rock. Nearby infrastructure, including thermal power plants, supports development.

18. SUKHPUR-II (2568-23)

The Sukhpur-II Block, covering 2,488.36 sq. km in the Kirthar Foldbelt of Sindh, Pakistan, presents a significant opportunity for hydrocarbon exploration. Located in Prospectivity Zone III, it is surrounded by nearby blocks with successful gas discoveries. The main trapping mechanism involves anticlinal traps linked to thrust faults. The block benefits from substantial seismic data, including 2D and 3D surveys. Nearby infrastructure, including gas fields, thermal power stations, and oil storage, provides strong support for development.

19. NAING SHARIF (2667-20)

The Naing Sharif Block, located in Shaheed Benazir Abad and Jamshoro districts, Sindh, spans 205.58 sq. km. with estimated resources of 4,740 million barrels of oil and 64.75 trillion cubic feet of gas. Situated in the Kirthar Foldbelt, it benefits from nearby gas fields and thermal power stations.

20. JHERRUCK 2469-13

The Jherruck Block (732.73 sq. km) in the Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan, lies in prospectivity Zone 3 and features rich hydrocarbon potential. Its petroleum system includes Sembar Shales (source rock), Lower Goru sands (reservoir), and Upper Goru marls (seal), with structural traps formed by tilted horst blocks. With substantial seismic data (2256.77 km of 2D and 2905.66 sq. km of 3D) and nearby prolific gas discoveries, the block offers a low-risk, high-reward investment opportunity.

ZONE I (F)

21. ZIARAT NORTH (2966-3)

The Ziarat North block spans 2120.5 sq. km in Balochistan, Pakistan, located within the Sulaiman Foldbelt, and is situated in Prospectivity Zone I (F). The block has significant hydrocarbon potential, with the Sembar Formation as the primary source rock and reservoirs in the Pirkoh and Sui Limestone formations.

22. KALAT NORTH (2966-4)

The Kalat North Block (2499.96 sq. km) in Balochistan Basin, Pakistan, lies in Prospectivity Zone I(F) with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. Its petroleum system includes prolific source rocks like Sembar Shales, reservoirs such as Dunghan Limestone and Pab Sandstones, and effective seals like Ghazij and Murga Faqirzai shales. Structural traps and high seismic data resolution enhance its hydrocarbon potential.

23. AHMAD WAL (2965-1)

Discover the untapped energy potential of the Ahmad Wal Block in Balochistan, Pakistan—an area rich in geological promise and hydrocarbon reserves. Spanning 2,268 sq. km, this onshore block lies in the heart of the Balochistan Basin, home to an estimated 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas.

24. PADAG (2864-3)

The Padag Block, located in Balochistan’s Chagai, Nushki, and Kharan districts, covers 2,477.39 sq. km. It lies within the Balochistan Basin, with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block features favorable geological structures for hydrocarbon accumulation, including anticlinal folds and thrust faults.

25. CHAGAI (2864-4)

Spanning 2,474.17 sq. km in the resource-rich Balochistan Basin, the Chagai Block offers immense hydrocarbon potential. With an estimated 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas, this high-reward block is strategically located near proven reserves and thriving infrastructure. Its favorable geological structures, including anticlinal traps and thrust faults, provide a prime environment for hydrocarbon accumulation.

26. DALBANDIN (2864-5)

The Makran Fold-Belt in the Balochistan Basin offers immense hydrocarbon potential with its rich source rocks, Miocene sandstone reservoirs, and effective shale seals. Its unique geology, shaped by subduction and thrust faulting, creates ideal trapping conditions.

27. MERUI (2864-6)

The Merui Block, located in Chagai district, Balochistan, spans 2478.68 sq. km and holds estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The block’s geology includes compressional structures favorable for hydrocarbon accumulation.

28. MERUI WEST (2863-1)

The Merui West Block, covering 2491.45 sq. km in Chagai district, Balochistan, is part of the Balochistan Basin with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. It features compressional structures ideal for hydrocarbon accumulation.

29. NOKUNDI SOUTH (2763-7)

The Nokundi South Block, located in Chagai district, Balochistan, spans 2,158.75 sq. km. with estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. Positioned in the Balochistan Basin, it features favorable anticlinal and thrust fault structures for hydrocarbon accumulation.

29. NOKUNDI (2862-2)

The Nokundi Block, located in Chagai district, Balochistan, spans 2,452.3 sq. km. Positioned in the Balochistan Basin, it features favorable anticlinal and thrust fault structures for hydrocarbon accumulation.

31. TOZGI (2861-1)

The Tozgi Block, spanning 2,427.58 sq. km in Chagai district, Balochistan, Pakistan, presents significant exploration potential in Prospectivity Zone I (F). The block is surrounded by the Nokundi block and is located within the Balochistan Basin, which holds substantial estimated resources of 8,676 million barrels of oil and 78 trillion cubic feet of gas. The area’s tectonic activity, including compressional structures and the Chaghai Magmatic Arc, provides favorable conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation.

Key Concepts of Petroleum Migration by Zhiyong He, ZetaWare, Inc.

Key Concepts of Petroleum Migration by Zhiyong He, ZetaWare, Inc.

Capillary Seals and Migration

Capillary seals are the primary mechanism controlling the movement of hydrocarbons within a sedimentary basin. These seals form barriers within the porous rock layers, preventing the vertical migration of oil and gas. Instead of moving upward toward the surface, hydrocarbons are often forced to migrate laterally along the stratigraphic layers of the basin.

Capillary seals arise due to differences in the rock properties, particularly pore throat sizes. Rocks with smaller pores (like mudstones or shales) generate higher capillary pressures that trap hydrocarbons beneath them. Vertical migration can only occur if the pressure from the buoyancy of oil and gas is strong enough to overcome this capillary force. As a result, lateral migration becomes the more common pathway for hydrocarbons, with the accumulation of oil and gas occurring in traps when they encounter geological structures like folds, faults, and salt domes.

Migration Rate

Hydrocarbon migration is a slow and gradual process, often taking years or even decades for hydrocarbons to move across pore spaces in a reservoir rock. The migration rate is influenced by a combination of capillary pressure, buoyancy, and the properties of the fluids involved, such as the mixture of oil and gas.

Capillary pressure refers to the resistance that hydrocarbons face when moving through small pore spaces in the rock. This resistance increases with smaller pore sizes, requiring higher buoyancy forces to drive the fluids. The rate of migration is also determined by the generation rate of hydrocarbons from the source rock. If the production of oil and gas is slow, migration will occur at a similarly slow pace, with hydrocarbons moving as they are generated.

Long-Distance Migration

In some basins, hydrocarbons can migrate over long distances, often traveling hundreds of kilometers before accumulating in traps. This long-distance migration is typical in low-relief basins, such as forland or continental basins, where geological structures do not impede lateral movement.

The ability of hydrocarbons to migrate over such distances is largely driven by the volume of hydrocarbons generated by the source rock. Rich source rocks that produce significant quantities of oil and gas push these fluids across the basin, allowing them to travel far before encountering a trap. The absence of substantial structural barriers also facilitates extended lateral migration, with hydrocarbons only accumulating when they encounter faults, pinch-outs, or other obstacles.

Capillary Pressure and Traps

Vertical vs. Lateral Migration

Vertical migration is typically more difficult due to the strong capillary pressures associated with impermeable or low-permeability rock layers. These barriers prevent hydrocarbons from moving upward unless the buoyancy forces can overcome the capillary resistance, which often requires a significant column of oil or gas. As a result, vertical migration is less common, and hydrocarbons are more likely to migrate laterally.

Lateral migration is easier because it encounters fewer barriers. Within a stratigraphic layer, such as a sandstone or carbonate, capillary pressures are often lower, making it easier for hydrocarbons to move sideways. This lateral migration continues until hydrocarbons encounter a trap that forces them to accumulate, such as a fault, a pinch-out, or a structural dome.

Capillary pressure and rock types: Different rock types exhibit varying levels of capillary pressure due to differences in pore throat sizes:

Shales or mudstones have small pore throats, creating high capillary pressures and acting as effective seals.

Sands or carbonates typically have larger pore throats, making them more permeable and allowing easier fluid movement.

This variation in capillary pressure influences the arrangement of oil and gas. Gas, being more buoyant, is often found above oil, but capillary pressure differences in the rock can cause hydrocarbons to accumulate in different ways, either vertically or laterally.

Capillary Pressure’s Role in Trap Formation

Capillary pressure is crucial in forming traps where hydrocarbons accumulate. When oil and gas migrate, they accumulate in areas where there is a significant difference in capillary pressure between rock layers. If the capillary pressure in a seal is high, hydrocarbons accumulate below it until the buoyancy pressure exceeds the capillary resistance, leading to the formation of reservoirs.

Traps such as faults, folds, and salt domes are critical for halting lateral migration and forcing hydrocarbons to accumulate. High-capacity traps with strong seals can hold large volumes of hydrocarbons, while weaker traps may only retain smaller quantities. This explains why some fields are larger and more productive than others.

What is happening in the area you’re working, please share your views!!!

Reference

Concepts and explanations regarding capillary seals, migration rates, and long-distance migration have been drawn from the presentation by Dr. Zong on “Capillary Seals and Petroleum Migration”.

Diagrams are also taken from this AAPG paper, “Migration and Charge Risk for Stratigraphic Traps “

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin Opportuintites

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities and Challenges

Exploring The Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities And Challenges

The Offshore Indus Pak G2-1, the deepest well drilled in the Offshore Indus in terms of water depth, offers interesting insights into the region’s hydrocarbon potential. Despite its depth, the 1D burial history graph (Figure 1) indicates that the well did not achieve the required burial to crack any hydrocarbons. This well, drilled near the Saurashtra Volcanic Arch, encountered a reef, yet remained dry, and the play couldn’t be established.

Reservoir Insights:

Drilling data reveals two sets of proven reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin

  • Widely Distributed Miocene Channel Sandstones
  • Locally Distributed Paleocene–Eocene Reef Limestone

Analogies with the adjacent Kutch Basin and the onshore Indus Basin suggest the possible existence of Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin.

Challenges and Historical Context:

The well stopped in the reef limestone after drilling over 200 meters, and unfortunately, it was dry. It was believed that the adjoining synclines would have generated hydrocarbons that would have migrated to the highs (the reefs) but the concept failed. Since the well was stopped early in the reef, remodeling of data in the context of basin is quite difficult. Had the well penetrated the basement, it would have been quite interesting. It was also believed that the reef would be riding all over the basement rocks.  The only proven reservoir is Middle Miocene deltaics that have produced gas in Pak Can-01, but the gas column was too small to justify infrastructure development.

It seems that volcanic activity plays a significant role in the evolution of the offshore part of the Indus Basin and its implications have far-reaching consequences on the hydrocarbon potential.

There have been two major volcanic events in the sea area of Pakistan:

Basalt Eruption of Somnath Ridge (~70 Ma)

Basalt Eruption of Deccan-Reunion (Reunion Mantle Plume, ~65 Ma)

According to Calvès et al. (2010), the basalt eruption of Somnath Ridge contributed to the formation of the volcanic basement in the southeastern Offshore Indus Basin, particularly around Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High. This area covers approximately 45,000 km².

Geological Insights:

Seismic data interpretation indicates (Figure 2) (that in the southeastern part of the basin adjacent to Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High, Deccan basalts are distributed in the marine-facies strata of the Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene in a laminated form (Khurram et al., 2019). The northwestern part, far from the Reunion mantle plume, has minimal basalt impact but is close to the strike-slip fault zone of Murray Ridge, making it a potential focus for future oil and gas exploration.

Geothermal Gradients:

Somnath Ridge: Low geothermal gradient of 33℃/km.

Sedimentary Center: High geothermal gradient of 37℃/km – 55℃/km, aiding source rock maturity (Calvès et al., 2010).

The northwestern part, with its developed faults near Murray Ridge, presents an interesting area for future exploration. There are chances that the established Cretaceous plays would be found there (Figure-02).

In most of the wells drilled, the source rocks are in oil window but Pak Can-01 produced gas suggesting that the gas would have been migrated from the deeper part of the basin. Modeling suggests that the Paleocene source rocks (effective in the adjoining onshore) may have become post mature at the end of Oligocene suggesting a charge to the Miocene and younger reservoirs by shallower source rocks.

🔗 Follow us for more insights into the evolving energy landscape and exploration opportunities in the Offshore Indus Basin!

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin

Figure 2 . After Shahzad et. al.

References:

Calves G, Schwab AM, Huuse M, Peter DC, Asif I.  2010.  Thermal regime of the northwest Indian rifted margin Comparison with Predictions. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1133–1147.  doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.02.010.

Chatterjee S, Goswami A, Scotese. 2013. The longest voyage: Tectonic, magmatic, and paleoclimatic evolution of the Indian plate during its northward flight from Gondwana to Asia. Gondwana Research, 23, 238–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.07.001.

Jian-ming Gonga, b, c, Jing Liaoa, b, *, Jie Lianga, b, Bao-hua Leia, b, Jian-wen Chena, b, Muhammad Khalid, Syed Waseem Haidere, Ming Meng. Exploration prospects of oil and gas in the Northwestern part of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan

Shahzad K, Betzler C, Ahmed N, Qayyum F, Spezzaferri S, Qadir A. 2018. Growth and demise of a Paleogene isolated carbonate platform of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan: Effects of regional and local controlling factors. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 107, 481–504. doi: 10.1007/s00531-017-1504-7.