• Welcome to Saif Energy Limited : (051) 5913012

Tag Archives: #SeismicData

AI in Geoscience- Hype Hope and the Road Ahead

AI in Geoscience- Hype Hope and the Road Ahead

In the era of big data, geoscience stands at the crossroads of tradition and transformation. With petabytes of seismic, well log, and core data available, Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a way to cut through the complexity of hidden geological past to uncover faster, delivering tangible results/findings by reducing human bias, to reach smarter exploration decisions.

In an industry built purely on data, yet driven by interpretation, geoscience has always been a fertile ground for innovation. From seismic waves echoing through the subsurface to the tiniest porosity variation in a core sample, geoscientists are constantly deciphering nature’s complex code. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have emerged as powerful tools to assist in this journey offering unparalleled speed, scale, and groundbreaking statistical strength which human mind could never accomplish.

But is AI the game-changer, we think it is? Or are we walking a tightrope between automation and abstraction?

Why AI, and Why Now?

The oil and gas industry like many others is grappling with the twin pressures of cost efficiency and smarter decision-making. Exploration and development decisions hinge on interpreting massive datasets: seismic volumes, well logs, core data, production history, studies report spanning 1000s of pages and more. AI provides a way to mine these datasets for patterns, predictions, and details that might otherwise go unnoticed or take months of human effort.

Where AI is Making an Impact in Geoscience

AI is no longer a theoretical tool. Here’s where it’s actively being deployed:

  • Seismic Interpretation
    Deep learning models are assisting in fault and horizon detection, seismic facies classification, and amplitude anomaly recognition. What once took weeks of manual effort is now achievable in hours with the right training data and labels.
  • Petrophysical Analysis
    Algorithms are automating log interpretation, identifying lithofacies, and even predicting mineral volumes in unconventional plays,  and other rocks properties such as porosity, permeability, Sw etc. Random Forests, XGBoost, SVM, PCA and Neural Networks are now part of the modern petrophysicist’s toolbox.
  • Reservoir Modeling
    AI helps streamline history matching and can optimize property modeling by learning from dynamic behavior, especially in complex carbonate and fractured reservoirs.
  • Thermal and Basin Modeling
    From burial history to source rock maturity, AI models can simulate and predict based on sparse calibration data reducing dependency on deterministic workflows.
  • Matching Core Data with Log Data AI is bridging the gap between high-resolution core analysis in labs, core photos, core reports and the downhole log data, making it easier to integrate them all.
  • Pressure Predictions and Geomechanics Trained ML models on old well data, are predicting pore pressure trends at lightning speed, which helps in everything from drilling safety to designing wells.

ML First, DL Later?

While deep learning catches most headlines in AI, yet the majority of geoscientific applications today rely on classical machine learning—Random Forests, XGBoost, and clustering techniques. These models are used for their interpretability and ability to work with structured data like well logs and petrophysical curves.

Deep learning, on the other hand, is making strides primarily in seismic interpretation and image-like data domains. But due to its hunger for labeled data and computational power, its adoption is still more limited compared to traditional ML at least for now until we have trained models on every kind of data. To unlock its full potential, we need comprehensive training datasets that includes all relevant labeled data, horizons, faults, well logs, VSPs, and more. Seismic imagery, in particular, plays a critical role in advancing these applications, enabling more meaningful interpretations and paving the way for future breakthroughs

Open-Source AI in Geoscience: Real Models, Real Impact

One of the most exciting developments in recent years has been the open-source release of AI models trained specifically on geoscientific data. These models have emerged from both industry-led competitions and collaborative research projects and these datasets and models are putting cutting-edge technology into the hands of everyone, sparking innovation and making advanced tools accessible to all. These open-source datasets are more than just tools—they’re opportunities. Anyone can use them to deploy their own AI models, contributing new ideas and advancing the field. By sharing solutions openly on platforms like GitHub, researchers and developers are creating a community where innovation thrives and progress is accessible to all.

1. FORCE 2020 Machine Learning Competition (Norway)

One of the landmark events was the FORCE ML competition, organized by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate in 2020. The goal was to build machine learning models for lithology prediction and fault identification using open North Sea well data.

  • Tasks: Lithofacies classification from well logs and fault interpretation from seismic.
  • Data: Released public well logs and seismic volumes from the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
  • Results: Dozens of teams submitted models using Random Forests, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and ensemble methods.
  • Outcome: Many of the winning models and notebooks were made open-source on GitHub, enabling others to build upon them.

👉 Example Repo: https://github.com/bolgebrygg/force2020
👉 Datasets: https://www.force2020.net

2. The SEG Machine Learning Contests (2019–2022)

The Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) launched several AI competitions, particularly around salt body segmentation in seismic data. These contests offered open access to labeled seismic datasets, pushing forward the use of deep learning in geoscience.

  • Popular Models Used: U-Net architectures for segmentation, often implemented in TensorFlow or PyTorch.
  • Learning Outcome: Seismic image segmentation became a benchmark task for geoscientific AI.
  • Key Benefit: It created reusable architectures for other segmentation tasks like faults, channels, and facies.

👉 Example Repo: https://github.com/seg/2020-ml-contest

3. OSDU (Open Subsurface Data Universe)

OSDU is creating a massive shared data platform for the industry with the intention of enabling more AI research. Several AI-ready datasets and connectors are being published to make reproducibility and deployment easier across companies.

👉 OSDU Community: https://osduforum.org

What Are the Advantages of AI?

Speed and Efficiency
Models can scan and interpret vast datasets in a fraction of the time a human would need.

Pattern Recognition Beyond Human Perception
AI detects subtle relationships in data like seismic signatures correlated to lithology changes that may elude traditional methods.

Consistency and Objectivity
Unlike humans, AI does not tire or introduce interpretation bias assuming the model is well-trained.

Data Fusion
ML models can combine logs, seismic, production, and even textual reports to generate holistic insights.

Scalability
Once trained, models can be applied across multiple fields or basins with minimal tweaks.

And the Limitations?

Despite the promise, these are some real-world limitations:

  • Quality of Training Data
    The model is only as good as the data it learns from. Poor data quality or missing labels leads to unreliable outputs.
  • Black Box Models
    Deep learning models can lack transparency. Geoscientists may struggle to understand why a model made a certain prediction.
  • Overfitting and Generalization
    A model trained on one basin may not generalize to another without retraining or revalidation. If the testing data is different from the training data, the outcome may be authentic which needs care.
  • Geological Context Still Matters
    AI may identify patterns, but it doesn’t understand tectonics, depositional systems, or the basin’s geologic history unless you teach it indirectly.
  • Misplaced Trust in Automation
    Relying entirely on AI without domain knowledge can lead to oversights. AI should augment, not replace, geoscientific intuition.

A Glimpse into the Future

The best results seem to come from hybrid models—where physics-based understanding is combined with data-driven prediction. For instance, integrating Rock Physics templates with AI-driven facies classification leads to more robust models.

The future may also see AI helping with probabilistic interpretation, real-time drilling optimization, and even automated basin screening—all while being explainable and trustworthy.

The Future of AI in Geoscience

AI isn’t going to replace geoscientists anytime soon, what it’s really going to do is freeing them up to focus on more complex, high-level questions. As tools get better and datasets become more accessible, we’re likely to see advances in areas like:

  • Hybrid models combining AI with physics-based approaches
  • Explainable AI tools that make black-box models more transparent
  • Open collaborations between researchers, startups, and companies

Conclusion

AI is a tool a very powerful one but it works best when paired with human expertise. The real winners in this space will be those who can blend advanced algorithms with a deep understanding of geology.

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin Opportuintites

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities and Challenges

Exploring The Offshore Indus Basin: Opportunities And Challenges

The Offshore Indus Pak G2-1, the deepest well drilled in the Offshore Indus in terms of water depth, offers interesting insights into the region’s hydrocarbon potential. Despite its depth, the 1D burial history graph (Figure 1) indicates that the well did not achieve the required burial to crack any hydrocarbons. This well, drilled near the Saurashtra Volcanic Arch, encountered a reef, yet remained dry, and the play couldn’t be established.

Reservoir Insights:

Drilling data reveals two sets of proven reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin

  • Widely Distributed Miocene Channel Sandstones
  • Locally Distributed Paleocene–Eocene Reef Limestone

Analogies with the adjacent Kutch Basin and the onshore Indus Basin suggest the possible existence of Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs in the Offshore Indus Basin.

Challenges and Historical Context:

The well stopped in the reef limestone after drilling over 200 meters, and unfortunately, it was dry. It was believed that the adjoining synclines would have generated hydrocarbons that would have migrated to the highs (the reefs) but the concept failed. Since the well was stopped early in the reef, remodeling of data in the context of basin is quite difficult. Had the well penetrated the basement, it would have been quite interesting. It was also believed that the reef would be riding all over the basement rocks.  The only proven reservoir is Middle Miocene deltaics that have produced gas in Pak Can-01, but the gas column was too small to justify infrastructure development.

It seems that volcanic activity plays a significant role in the evolution of the offshore part of the Indus Basin and its implications have far-reaching consequences on the hydrocarbon potential.

There have been two major volcanic events in the sea area of Pakistan:

Basalt Eruption of Somnath Ridge (~70 Ma)

Basalt Eruption of Deccan-Reunion (Reunion Mantle Plume, ~65 Ma)

According to Calvès et al. (2010), the basalt eruption of Somnath Ridge contributed to the formation of the volcanic basement in the southeastern Offshore Indus Basin, particularly around Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High. This area covers approximately 45,000 km².

Geological Insights:

Seismic data interpretation indicates (Figure 2) (that in the southeastern part of the basin adjacent to Somnath Ridge and Saurashtra High, Deccan basalts are distributed in the marine-facies strata of the Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene in a laminated form (Khurram et al., 2019). The northwestern part, far from the Reunion mantle plume, has minimal basalt impact but is close to the strike-slip fault zone of Murray Ridge, making it a potential focus for future oil and gas exploration.

Geothermal Gradients:

Somnath Ridge: Low geothermal gradient of 33℃/km.

Sedimentary Center: High geothermal gradient of 37℃/km – 55℃/km, aiding source rock maturity (Calvès et al., 2010).

The northwestern part, with its developed faults near Murray Ridge, presents an interesting area for future exploration. There are chances that the established Cretaceous plays would be found there (Figure-02).

In most of the wells drilled, the source rocks are in oil window but Pak Can-01 produced gas suggesting that the gas would have been migrated from the deeper part of the basin. Modeling suggests that the Paleocene source rocks (effective in the adjoining onshore) may have become post mature at the end of Oligocene suggesting a charge to the Miocene and younger reservoirs by shallower source rocks.

🔗 Follow us for more insights into the evolving energy landscape and exploration opportunities in the Offshore Indus Basin!

Exploring the Offshore Indus Basin

Figure 2 . After Shahzad et. al.

References:

Calves G, Schwab AM, Huuse M, Peter DC, Asif I.  2010.  Thermal regime of the northwest Indian rifted margin Comparison with Predictions. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1133–1147.  doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.02.010.

Chatterjee S, Goswami A, Scotese. 2013. The longest voyage: Tectonic, magmatic, and paleoclimatic evolution of the Indian plate during its northward flight from Gondwana to Asia. Gondwana Research, 23, 238–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2012.07.001.

Jian-ming Gonga, b, c, Jing Liaoa, b, *, Jie Lianga, b, Bao-hua Leia, b, Jian-wen Chena, b, Muhammad Khalid, Syed Waseem Haidere, Ming Meng. Exploration prospects of oil and gas in the Northwestern part of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan

Shahzad K, Betzler C, Ahmed N, Qayyum F, Spezzaferri S, Qadir A. 2018. Growth and demise of a Paleogene isolated carbonate platform of the Offshore Indus Basin, Pakistan: Effects of regional and local controlling factors. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 107, 481–504. doi: 10.1007/s00531-017-1504-7.